Apple's New Watches, From a Runner's Perspective

Apple announced the Watch Ultra 4 and Series 12 yesterday, and if you want the spec sheet, every tech site on the internet already has it up. What you won't get from most of them is what actually changed if you're someone who buys a watch specifically to run in. So here's that version, opinions included.

Ultra 4: The One Real Upgrade That Matters

Same $799 price as the Ultra 3. Same 49mm case. Same dual-band GPS. Here's the thing that's actually news for runners: the Ultra 4 jumps from training-tier analytics all the way to Apple's max tier. The Ultra 3 never got there. That's not a spec bump, that's Apple finally taking a real swing at the deep training-data space Garmin and Coros have owned for years.

GPS battery goes from 14 hours to 18. Not huge, but real, and it matters if you're the type who's cut a long run short worrying about the watch dying before you finish.

What still doesn't move the needle: 18 hours of GPS is still nowhere close to what a serious ultra or ruggedized watch offers elsewhere. The Coros Vertix 2S does 73. The Garmin Enduro 3 does 90. If you're training for anything beyond a marathon distance, the Ultra 4 is still the watch you have to plan a charge around, not the one you forget exists.

Series 12: A Nice Chip Update, Nothing More

Same $399. Same single-band GPS Series 11 always had, this isn't a downgrade, people who tell you it is are wrong, it's just still not dual-band. Two more hours of GPS battery, up to 10. A new daily Readiness score that pulls heart rate, sleep, and training load into one number.

Honest take: this is a fine watch to get if you're already deciding between Apple Watches. It is not a watch that's going to make a Garmin or Coros owner think twice. The Readiness score is Apple playing catch-up to a feature Garmin's Body Battery and Coros' recovery metrics have offered for years, not a leapfrog.

Why "Real Runners" Mostly Don't Wear Apple Watches

Here's my actual opinion on this, not a spec comparison. I've run for a long time, I've tried a lot of watches, and I can tell you why the serious training crowd skews so hard toward Garmin and Coros instead of Apple, even with Apple closing some real gaps this year.

Battery life is the biggest one, and it's not close. Even the Ultra 4's 18 hours gets smoked by a $249 Coros Pace 4 that outlasts it on GPS runtime for a third of the price. When your training block includes long runs, back-to-back workouts, or a race weekend without a charger nearby, that gap stops being a spec and starts being a real problem.

Touchscreens and sweat don't mix. A watch built around tapping a screen is a watch that starts missing your inputs the second your fingers get wet, which is exactly when you're mid-interval and don't have time to fight with a display. Garmin and Coros still lean on physical buttons for exactly this reason. Apple hasn't fully solved it, they've worked around it.

Apple's whole platform was built as a computer for your wrist that happens to run apps, not a training tool that happens to be smart. Garmin, Coros, Suunto, and Polar exist because of sports science, full stop, that's the entire premise of the company. Apple Watch started as an iPhone accessory and grew running features on top of that foundation. You can feel the difference in the details: how deep the training-load tools go, how the recovery metrics are framed, how seriously the whole ecosystem treats a hard interval session versus a walk to the mailbox.

And the ecosystem lock-in is real. If you're on Android, none of this matters, you can't buy an Apple Watch at all. If you're on iPhone and want to switch to a better running-specific watch later, you're not just buying new hardware, you're leaving an entire ecosystem behind. Garmin, Coros, Amazfit, and Suunto all work across both platforms. That flexibility matters more than people give it credit for.

None of that makes the Ultra 4 or Series 12 bad watches. The Ultra 4 specifically is the most serious running watch Apple has ever made, that max-tier jump is real. But "most serious Apple has ever made" and "what a serious runner should actually buy" are still two different sentences, and this year's announcement doesn't change that, even with the real improvements.

Where That Leaves You

If you're already on iPhone, already own Apple Watches, and don't want to leave the ecosystem: Ultra 4 if you want Apple's deepest training data and can live with 18 hours of GPS. Series 12 if you're upgrading from something old and don't need dual-band precision.

If you're not already locked into Apple and you're serious about training: this is still Garmin and Coros' game. Check out our how the Ultra 4 stacks up against the Garmin Fenix 9, see all watch comparisons or browse the Watch Finder to see exactly how these stack up against what serious runners actually reach for.

---

This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase through them we may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you.