Garmin Forerunner 255 vs Garmin Forerunner 265
The core training tools are nearly identical, so the real decision is screen technology: the 255 uses a sunlight-readable MIP display and costs $100 less, the 265 trades that for a brighter AMOLED touchscreen.
GarminGarmin Forerunner 255
GarminGarmin Forerunner 265
- •You prefer a MIP display that stays perfectly readable in direct sunlight and sips less battery
- •$100 in savings matters more than a touchscreen or AMOLED brightness
- •You want a bright, colorful AMOLED touchscreen and don't mind the extra battery draw
- •You want the watch most commonly recommended as the all-around best pick
The Forerunner 255 remains one of the most practical options for runners who prefer a sunlight-readable MIP display over an AMOLED screen. With full triathlon support, multi-band GPS, and HRV tracking, it gives you 90% of the Forerunner 265's features at a frequent discount.
The 265 pairs a bright touchscreen with real training-load and recovery metrics, without pushing into flagship pricing. It remains one of the most recommended running watches on the market for good reason: it just covers the bases extremely well.
*Estimated — this model's exact GPS battery life isn't published by the manufacturer. All figures are standard GPS mode, midsize case, no solar boost.
This page contains affiliate links. If you purchase through them we earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Not sure either of these is right?
Answer four quick questions and get matched from every current watch we track.
Try the Watch Finder →