Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Polar Pacer Pro
Same training-tier analytics, but the 165 costs $100 less and rates meaningfully higher than the Pacer Pro.
GarminGarmin Forerunner 165
PolarPolar Pacer Pro
- •You want Garmin's higher-rated, cheaper entry-level watch
- •You don't need Polar's specific training software ecosystem
- •You're invested in Polar's training platform and app ecosystem
- •A lighter, more comfortable fit matters more to you than the rating gap
The 165 brings Garmin's core running metrics, an AMOLED display, and music storage down to a price that doesn't feel like a compromise. It's the watch we'd point most casual-to-intermediate runners toward before recommending anything more expensive.
Pacer Pro upgrades the screen and adds training load and recovery pro features on top of the standard Pacer's foundation. It remains one of the lighter, more comfortable options at this price point.
*Estimated — this model's exact GPS battery life isn't published by the manufacturer. All figures are standard GPS mode, midsize case, no solar boost.
†Estimated — this model launched too recently to have an established customer rating yet.
This page contains affiliate links. If you purchase through them we earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Not sure either of these is right?
Answer four quick questions and get matched from every current watch we track.
Try the Watch Finder →