Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Garmin Forerunner 265
Both run the same training-analytics tier, so this isn't really a features question, it's whether the 265's reputation as the most-recommended running watch on the market is worth $200 to you.
GarminGarmin Forerunner 165
GarminGarmin Forerunner 265
- •You want Garmin's real training metrics without paying premium pricing
- •You're fine being one step behind the watch reviewers point to first
- •You want the watch most commonly recommended as the all-around best pick
- •$200 more for peace of mind on the choice is worth it to you
The 165 brings Garmin's core running metrics, an AMOLED display, and music storage down to a price that doesn't feel like a compromise. It's the watch we'd point most casual-to-intermediate runners toward before recommending anything more expensive.
The 265 pairs a bright touchscreen with real training-load and recovery metrics, without pushing into flagship pricing. It remains one of the most recommended running watches on the market for good reason: it just covers the bases extremely well.
*Estimated — this model's exact GPS battery life isn't published by the manufacturer. All figures are standard GPS mode, midsize case, no solar boost.
†Estimated — this model launched too recently to have an established customer rating yet.
This page contains affiliate links. If you purchase through them we earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Not sure either of these is right?
Answer four quick questions and get matched from every current watch we track.
Try the Watch Finder →