Coros Pace 4 vs Garmin Forerunner 265
Same analytics tier, and the Pace 4 actually rates higher (4.8 vs 4.7) while costing $200 less, Coros wins on pure value here, Garmin wins on brand ecosystem and touchscreen software polish.
CorosCoros Pace 4
GarminGarmin Forerunner 265
- •You want the best-reviewed value pick in this entire lineup plus new offline maps feature
- •You don't need Garmin's specific software ecosystem or app library
- •You want the watch that shows up as "most recommended" across the widest range of reviewers
- •Garmin's broader ecosystem and third-party app support matter to you
At just 32 grams with a bright AMOLED screen and real running dynamics, the Pace 4 punches well above its price. It skips maps and deep smartwatch features on purpose, focusing entirely on being an excellent, lightweight training tool.
The 265 pairs a bright touchscreen with real training-load and recovery metrics, without pushing into flagship pricing. It remains one of the most recommended running watches on the market for good reason: it just covers the bases extremely well.
*Estimated — this model's exact GPS battery life isn't published by the manufacturer. All figures are standard GPS mode, midsize case, no solar boost.
†Estimated — this model launched too recently to have an established customer rating yet.
This page contains affiliate links. If you purchase through them we earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Not sure either of these is right?
Answer four quick questions and get matched from every current watch we track.
Try the Watch Finder →