Amazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra vs Garmin Forerunner 265
The Cheetah 2 Ultra reaches max-tier analytics for $151 more, but the 265's training-tier depth already covers most runners' needs and rates far higher in practice.
AmazfitAmazfit Cheetah 2 Ultra
GarminGarmin Forerunner 265
- •You specifically need max-tier analytics for ultra-distance trail efforts
- •A bigger screen for reading maps is worth the premium and lower rating
- •You want Garmin's highly-rated, AMOLED training watch for less
- •Training-tier analytics already cover what most runners need
The Cheetah 2 Ultra targets mountain ultrarunners specifically, with a bigger screen for reading maps and enough battery to cover long efforts without a mid-race charge. A legitimate alternative to Garmin's Enduro or Suunto's Vertical, at a lower price.
The 265 pairs a bright touchscreen with real training-load and recovery metrics, without pushing into flagship pricing. It remains one of the most recommended running watches on the market for good reason: it just covers the bases extremely well.
*Estimated — this model's exact GPS battery life isn't published by the manufacturer. All figures are standard GPS mode, midsize case, no solar boost.
†Estimated — this model launched too recently to have an established customer rating yet.
This page contains affiliate links. If you purchase through them we earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.
Not sure either of these is right?
Answer four quick questions and get matched from every current watch we track.
Try the Watch Finder →